Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Witnesses tell Michigan committee ranked‑choice voting would complicate elections, risk ballot exhaustion
Summary
Two witnesses told the Michigan House Committee on Election Integrity that ranked‑choice voting (RCV) would make voting and election administration harder, could lead to ballot exhaustion and recount litigation, and carries substantial implementation costs, citing examples from Alaska, Maine, New York City and Oakland.
LANSING — Two witnesses told the Michigan House Committee on Election Integrity that adopting ranked‑choice voting statewide would complicate voting, slow results and risk throwing out ballots, while committee members said they want proponents to present counterarguments before any action.
Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, told the committee that RCV “really does fundamentally jeopardize free and fair elections, particularly when it comes to voter confidence in the election system and to the transparency and accountability that voters expect.” His colleague, Trent England, summarized their position bluntly: “Ranked choice voting makes voting harder.”
The witnesses described how an RCV ballot asks voters to rank multiple candidates in each race and said that, if many voters stop ranking their choices before the final round, those ballots can be “exhausted” and removed from later rounds of tabulation. Snead and England warned that this mechanism…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

