Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grant Administration Nonprofits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners direct staff to pare nonprofit grant paperwork to legal minimum, seek quick review amid concerns about withheld funds and layoffs
Summary
Three Mason County commissioners on June 23 instructed staff to prepare a pared-down version of the county’s nonprofit funding and grant-administration materials — trimming nonmandatory requirements to those required by law — and to return a comparison of other counties’ handbooks and a proposed reduced packet at a future briefing, with a requested timeframe of roughly two weeks.
Three Mason County commissioners on June 23 instructed staff to prepare a pared-down version of the county’s nonprofit funding and grant-administration materials — trimming nonmandatory requirements to those required by law — and to return a comparison of other counties’ handbooks and a proposed reduced packet at a future briefing, with a requested timeframe of roughly two weeks.
Commissioners expressed concerns raised by local nonprofits during recent rounds of grant administration: organizations told commissioners they had not seen contracts in advance, could not take documents to their boards for approval and in some cases felt county guidance had effectively directed nonprofit boards rather than advising them. Commissioners said some funds had been withheld in past cycles and that past procedures had led to operational strain in the sector.
One commissioner asked that county legal counsel review the proposed pared-down materials before they are finalized. "I would like to make sure that Tim reviews it and make sure that it's ..." the commissioner said, asking staff to confirm legal review before implementation. Another commissioner asked for a side-by-side comparison showing the relative scope of Mason County’s application and payment workbook compared with Kitsap County and others; a county staff member said Mason County’s workbook was much thicker than Kitsap’s and other counties.
Commissioners also discussed broader contract decisions tied to homeless-services contracting and noted concern about prior staff layoffs tied to the contracting process. A commissioner said six positions had been identified for layoff in prior communications and asked staff to consider implementation risks before changing funding decisions. Commissioners asked staff to bring the pared-back materials and the legal review to the next briefing and to proceed only if the attorney and staff conclude there are no outstanding legal or fiscal liabilities.
No final funding decisions were made during the briefing; the commission’s direction was procedural: staff were told to prepare the reduced materials, provide comparisons and return with legal input on liabilities and process.
