Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves revised naming policy; removes sponsorship language and adds staff research requirement

5055074 · June 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council repealed a 2019 naming resolution and adopted resolution 25‑R‑49 with two amendments: references permitting sponsorship‑based naming were removed, and council added a requirement that staff research and background be provided to council before naming decisions. The amendments passed unanimously by roll call.

City council repealed the 2019 naming resolution and approved an updated naming policy (resolution 25‑R‑49) that establishes principles and procedures for naming city‑owned streets, facilities, parks and other assets.

The adopted policy lists acceptable naming criteria — geographic or common usage, natural or historical significance, or names tied to historic individuals or families — and says council retains final naming authority. At council’s direction, two amendments were adopted: references that would have allowed time‑limited sponsorship naming or naming tied to a significant sponsorship were removed, and an explicit sentence was added directing staff to research proposed naming requests and provide pertinent facts and background to council before consideration. Council members who spoke said they wanted to avoid “undue commercialization” and to ensure transparency and public sharing of staff research before votes.

Why it matters: Naming public assets can carry symbolic weight and community sensitivity. Council’s action narrows the policy to favor historical, geographic and commemorative naming and removes an explicit sponsorship pathway; it also requires staff research to be shared with council before consideration.

Vote and next steps: Council voted by roll call on the two amendments and then on the resolution; both passed unanimously (7‑0). Staff said they will follow the policy going forward and produce the background research on future naming requests for council review.