Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Labor Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances bill extending prevailing wage rules to bespoke off-site fabrication; lawmakers and counsel raise implementation questions

5048144 · June 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Ways and Means committee on June 20 advanced House Bill 2688 to extend prevailing-wage requirements to certain off-site, custom-fabricated systems and components that become part of public works projects.

The Joint Committee on Ways and Means recommended reporting out House Bill 2688, an expansion of prevailing-wage application to certain off-site, custom-fabricated "systems and components" made to specification for public-works projects.

The amendment (dash-a12) clarifies intent and would treat those bespoke off-site products as public works for prevailing-wage purposes, which would bring certified payroll, record-keeping and bonding requirements to work performed off site. Legislative counsel told the committee the change means "certain projects are now included within the definition of public works that were not before, and all projects that are public works have certain reporting requirements." The committee reported the bill out due pass as amended.

Why it matters: Sponsors said the provision ensures public dollars pay prevailing wages for work that in effect becomes part of a public project, even when fabrication occurs away from the job site. Opponents warned that the change is ambiguous and could sharply raise costs for municipal projects such as sewer systems.

Legal and implementation questions: Sean Brennan, legislative counsel, told lawmakers the bill does not "expand" prevailing-wage requirements in a technical sense but instead brings new categories of work into the public-works definition; those newly covered items would then be subject to the same reporting and pay rules as on-site work. Brennan said prevailing wage would likely be set for the locality where the public works project occurs rather than where fabrication occurs: "my supposition is... they would set a prevailing wage that is the prevailing wage for the location where the actual public works is taking place." He also said the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries may define components by rule.

Concerns from local governments and utilities: Lawmakers raised practical concerns about how prevailing wages would be applied when fabrication occurs out of state and how the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) would implement locality determinations. Representative Owens warned the changes "could go up" project costs and leave cities struggling with budgets for basic public works. He also pressed counsel about whether sewer pumps custom-made off site would be subject to prevailing wage; counsel replied that "if that particular sewer was of a character that's described... then yes." Representative Drazen and others called process concerns about major policy packages reaching Ways and Means late in session.

Decision and next steps: The committee passed the motion to report the bill out due pass as amended and closed the work session; the measure will advance for consideration with the committee's recommended amendment. Lawmakers asked for clarity during subsequent rule-making about definitions and locality determination.