Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facility Use Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board signals 2‑strike approach to facility‑use advertising violations, asks policy committee to refine language
Summary
Board members told the superintendent they want clearer enforcement when community groups use school facilities but fail to state that events are not district‑sponsored; members asked administration and the policy committee to add a warning/ban sequence to the limitations section of the facilities policy.
Get email alerts on the Facility Use Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members raised repeated concerns about community organizations advertising events held on school property without clearly stating the events are not sponsored by the district. At the June 10 workshop several members asked for stronger, clearer consequences for repeated violations of the district’s facilities‑use limitations.
Administrators said the existing policy requires community groups to "clearly communicate" that activities at school facilities are not district‑sponsored and that the superintendent has discretion to disapprove applications for noncompliance. The superintendent said she had contacted the group when an advertisement omission was brought to her attention, the group revised its ad and the event went forward.
Board members argued the district should adopt a more explicit, written enforcement sequence. A commonly proposed change was to add a formal warning on the first violation and revoke facility access after a second violation (a "two‑strike" approach). Members suggested placing that language in the limitations section and adding a clear printed notice to the facility‑use application so applicants understand consequences in advance.
The board directed the policy committee and administration to draft revised language that specifies a warning and subsequent forfeiture of facility use for repeated violations; the policy language and an updated facility‑use application will be brought back for the board’s consideration. No named organization was removed from facility use at the workshop.

