Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Emergency Services 911 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council schedules first reading of Hamilton County 911 plan resolution; members seek clarity on county-municipal process

5024919 · June 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Norwood City Council moved to give a first reading to a resolution approving the final Hamilton County 911 plan under Ohio Revised Code Chapter 128. Councilmembers asked procedural questions about how county 911 updates are distributed and the city’s opportunities to provide feedback.

Norwood City Council scheduled a first reading of a resolution to approve the final Hamilton County 911 plan pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Chapter 128 and declared the measure an emergency for procedural purposes.

Councilmember Missus Bolling moved to have the first reading; Councilmember Mister Garten seconded. During discussion, Councilmember Mister Moore asked how the county’s 911 plan and related communications flow to Norwood and what opportunities the city has to provide input. He said he had received correspondence from county staff and wanted clarity on where such materials should be routed within the city.

City staff answered that the request for approval on the county 911 plan originated with Fire Chief Tom McCabe and that the county takes feedback from area emergency responders when developing the plan. Staff said there is some back-and-forth during plan development, but at the council level there is typically limited opportunity to modify county policy documents; the council’s approval is a municipal step required under state law.

Council approved the motion to schedule a first reading by a unanimous roll call of members present. No amendments or substantive changes to the county plan were made by the council during the June 3 meeting; the motion was procedural to place the resolution for a first reading.