Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Alcohol Licensing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Phenix City Council reviews off-premise beer and wine license application for Food Mark 3

4138770 · June 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Phenix City Council considered an application for off-premise beer and wine licenses for Food Mark 3, submitted by owners identified as Ned and Patina, and received a letter from Chief Building Official Ray Rogers noting the facility lies outside the city’s fire-rescue jurisdiction.

The Phenix City Council reviewed an application for off-premise beer and off-premise wine licenses for a business trading as Food Mark 3, submitted by owners identified in the record as Ned and Patina.

Chief Building Official Ray Rogers submitted a letter about the application that the meeting record shows. The letter notes the facility is located outside the city’s fire-rescue jurisdiction, according to the meeting transcript. Council members asked for and recorded brief responses during roll call.

During roll call, the transcript records affirmative votes from "Council member David" and "Council member Bailey." The full vote tally and any final licensing determination are not fully recorded in the provided excerpt; the transcript shows the application was on the agenda and council members gave recorded responses during roll call.

The application covers both an off-premise beer license and an off-premise wine license for the business listed at an address beginning with 3717. The transcript identifies the applicant as "Ned and Patina" and the business as Food Mark 3; no last names for the applicants were provided in the excerpt. The record also notes the facility is outside the city fire-rescue response area, which the council and building official identified as a jurisdictional fact for the application.

Next steps for this application—whether final approval, conditions, or referral for further review—were not clear in the provided transcript excerpt.