Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Appointment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Players and a parent urge pause after personnel action; board confirms assistant varsity coach appointment
Summary
Several Eastern High School players and a parent asked the Eastern York School District board to pause the selection of an assistant varsity soccer coach and to consider volunteer coach Brock; the board had approved personnel items that included appointment of JT Highland as assistant varsity coach.
Students from Eastern High School and at least one parent urged the Eastern York School District board to pause a personnel decision concerning the varsity soccer assistant coach and to reconsider a volunteer coach, saying many players support him.
Landon Stock, a rising sophomore, told the board the players ‘‘represent coach Brock’’ and said Brock has been ‘‘instrumental’’ in motivating teammates. Other student speakers described Brock’s outreach to injured players, individualized attention and volunteer work, and several named teammates who support him. ‘‘Brock makes our health, every player, a top priority of his,’’ one player said.
A parent who identified himself as Jeff told the board the students’ willingness to speak publicly showed courage and urged officials to pause the decision. He criticized what he described as a change in the job structure after interviews were completed — namely, posting a single paid position and later treating it as a split role — and said that approach ‘‘doesn't seem right.’’ Jeff also argued volunteer service should be considered in hiring decisions.
Board documents and the meeting record show the board moved and seconded personnel items identified as 10.1–10.5 and approved them by voice vote. When a commenter later asked whether the board had approved the appointment of JT Highland as assistant varsity coach ‘‘as part of that personnel decision,’’ a board member confirmed the appointment.
Students asked the board to ‘‘pause the decision’’ and allow additional conversation; that request did not change the personnel vote taken earlier in the meeting. There was no motion recorded in the public comment that altered or rescinded the earlier personnel approval.
The student speakers provided a list they said contained about 20 teammates who support Brock. Board members acknowledged the comments and said they would follow up according to district procedures when appropriate. The board did not reopen the personnel vote during the meeting.
The transcript does not include details about the advertisement, selection process timeline, or the pay structure for the position beyond the public commenter's assertion that an advertised single position had been treated later as a split role. The board did not provide a public response beyond confirming the appointment during the meeting.
