Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Art Outreach topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oviedo board to pursue outreach, promotion and research into utility‑box wraps; Theresa to follow up
Summary
The Oviedo Public Arts Board discussed promoting a new exhibition, outreach to local businesses and organizations, and using utility‑box wraps as public art. The board asked Theresa to research wrap durability, permit/utility approvals and state-level developments affecting local public art funding.
Board members at the June 16 meeting discussed outreach and promotion for a new exhibition, options for distributing publicity through the Oviedo Facebook page and local newspapers, and possible partners including Nelson and Company and local churches.
Members described outreach steps staff and board volunteers could take — posting on the city’s Oviedo Facebook page, contacting local developers and businesses, and forwarding promotional materials to local communication contacts — and asked staff to circulate the promotional email list to board members for additional suggestions.
Separately, the board discussed whether to pursue wrapped utility‑box artwork or painted utility boxes. Members noted both approaches exist in other Florida cities and that wraps may offer greater durability in outdoor conditions; they also said utility companies typically require an agreement or permission before artwork is applied. The board asked Theresa to contact the Florida Public Arts Association network and utility companies to determine which approach (wrap vs. painted) is more durable and what approvals or agreements are required.
Board members also asked Theresa to report back on any state‑level proposals discussed at the recent public arts conference that would affect how local governments can use development funds for public art. Theresa agreed to research both the durability/approval question for box art and the state‑level policy updates and to bring findings to a future meeting.
The board treated these items as staff follow‑up rather than votes; members expressed broad support for moving forward with coordinated promotion and for staff to collect technical and policy information before committing to a specific box‑art approach.
