Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses status of accessory building after demolition on Columbus Avenue; no action taken
Summary
Board members asked whether a remaining accessory building becomes a primary structure after the front house was demolished on Columbus Avenue. Staff said the determination depends on applicable codes and how the structure is used; neighbors reported concern about illegal activity and increased patrols.
A Sandusky Boards & Commissions member asked whether an accessory building at a Columbus Avenue property becomes a primary structure after the primary house was demolished. Staff replied that the answer depends on applicable codes and how the building can be used under those codes.
Board member William Siemens said the primary house had been taken down and asked whether the accessory structure in the rear would then be considered the main dwelling. City staff explained that whether an accessory structure can become the primary dwelling depends on code permissions and whether the structure could legally house the principal use.
A board member relayed neighborhood reports that the rear structure had been used for illegal activity and said neighbors appreciated the demolition of the front house. The board noted the city’s increased patrols in the area. No formal action or vote was taken; the item was a request for clarification and not a decision point.
The staff response was informational: determining the structure’s status requires review under “all applicable codes” and any necessary enforcement steps would follow code determinations and interdepartmental procedures.
