Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Immigration Arrest Authority topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate passes bill allowing arrests of people unlawfully present anywhere in Ohio
Summary
The Ohio Senate on June 17 passed Senate Bill 172, which specifies that people unlawfully present in the United States are not privileged from arrest anywhere in Ohio, a measure that drew extended debate about due process, local control and impacts on courts and immigrant communities.
COLUMBUS, Ohio — The Ohio Senate on June 17 passed Senate Bill 172, a measure that specifies people unlawfully present in the United States "are not privileged from arrest" anywhere in the state, by a vote of 23 yeas to 8 nays.
The bill’s sponsor, Senator Rogner, said the measure reaffirms that immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility and that Ohio should not be a refuge for people who entered the country illegally. "If you are in this country legally, you have no reason to be afraid, and we welcome you here," Rogner said on the floor, while urging colleagues to support the bill.
Supporters said the bill prevents local policies or court rules from blocking federal and local efforts to detain or remove people suspected of being unlawfully present. The measure states that no person suspected of unlawful presence is privileged from arrest, detention or being held in custody by federal, state, or local law enforcement "with or without a warrant," and it supersedes any conflicting local rule, ordinance, resolution or policy. It also bars public offices and officials from interfering with arrests and shields people acting in good faith from civil or criminal penalties.
Opponents raised constitutional and practical concerns. Senator Weinstein said the bill authorizes detention on suspicion alone and risks profiling, overreach and the wrongful detention of people who are not accused of criminal conduct. "It allows state and local law enforcement to detain individuals based not on a warrant or a conviction, but on suspicion alone," Weinstein said. Senator DeMora called the bill "racist, ineffective, and promot[ing] a culture of fear," saying it would chill immigrants’ willingness to use courts and public services.
Several senators noted local court policies were a prompting factor for the legislation. Sponsors and supporters pointed to recent local rules in Franklin County intended to limit civil immigration arrests at courthouses; opponents responded that the bill would undermine access to justice by making people afraid to appear in court as witnesses, victims or defendants.
Senator Liston moved to refer Senate Bill 172 to the judiciary committee for additional hearings so judges, local officials and legal experts could examine constitutional and operational impacts. The motion to re-refer failed, 8 yeas to 24 nays. The Senate then voted on the bill itself; after the roll call the chair announced, "With 23 yays and 8 nays, the bill is passed and entitled." The Senate also agreed to the bill’s title.
Discussion on the floor included multiple accounts from senators who described local incidents they say illustrate the issue or the potential consequences of the bill, including concerns about arrests at courthouses, the handling of detainees and cross‑jurisdictional transfers. Senators urging a no vote urged colleagues to consider due process, separation of powers and the operational effects on county jails and local law enforcement.
Senate Bill 172 now carries the Senate’s approval; the Senate agreed to the title following the vote.
