Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Medical Examiner Fees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Supervisors direct clarification of medical examiner fee split and chain-of-command procedures

3865505 · June 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Osceola County supervisors discussed how to allocate a $250 per-call medical examiner fee and agreed to clarify language so the medical examiner determines distribution and the county follows chain-of-command protocols.

The Osceola County Board of Supervisors agreed to revise the county language governing distribution of medical examiner fees and to respect a chain-of-command process after discussing who should receive a standard $250 per-call payment.

Supervisors and staff said the medical examiner (ME) wants authority to decide how to split the $250 fee between the ME and investigators on a per-call basis. County staff described a recent split in which the ME paid themself $100 and an investigator $150.

"The medical examiner wants to decide who gets paid," a board member said while discussing how to frame the policy. "He wants it to follow the chain of command."

Staff and supervisors discussed that calls for ME services should follow protocol: an ME or the ME's designee must authorize investigations and examinations before county personnel respond. The board asked staff to update the minutes and reword the resolution so distributions become "a $250 split upon recommendation of the medical examiner," or similar language that leaves allocation to ME discretion.

Clerk Rochelle and other staff confirmed that the county normally receives a $250 invoice for each call and the ME currently determines the internal split. The board voted to have staff verify and revise the language and return it for review; members approved the clarification by voice vote.

No change to the underlying amount ($250) was proposed; the action was limited to clarifying how the fee is allocated and ensuring calls follow existing chain-of-command protocols.