Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Walworth County board denies shoreland setback variance for Lake Geneva property

June 12, 2025 | Walworth County, Wisconsin


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Walworth County board denies shoreland setback variance for Lake Geneva property
The Walworth County Board of Adjustment denied a variance request from applicants Eric and Greta Wautowska to reduce the required 75‑foot shore yard setback to approximately 48 feet for property at N3163 Quail Road, Lake Geneva.

The decision came after board members reviewed the criteria for variances and concluded the property does not show unique limitations or unnecessary hardship that would justify an exception to the Walworth County Shoreland Zoning Ordinance.

Chair Ann Seiver said, “There’s nothing about this property that’s any different from the properties around it, really,” and added environmental concern was a key factor for her vote. Seiver described the water feature on the property as “a spring fed stream that goes to Lake Como. You can drink out of this stream.”

Nick Sigman, zoning staff, summarized the request to the board as a petition for a reduced shore yard setback under the county’s shoreland rules and provided the property’s zoning as R‑2, single‑family residence district. The applicants had sought an approximate 48‑foot setback where the ordinance requires 75 feet.

Board members discussed the variance criteria — unique property limitations, unnecessary hardship, and harm to the public interest — and repeatedly said they did not find the factual basis to grant the variance. One member said the board’s role is to protect resources and consider long‑term consequences when a variance “stays with this property from now for as long as it’s there.”

The motion to deny the petition carried and the petition was denied. The board did not set a future action on this matter during the meeting.

The item was presented as a new business petition; public comment and additional evidence were not recorded in the meeting transcript.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Wisconsin articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI