Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Library Collections Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board pauses resolution to declare library books obsolete after debate over titles and process
Summary
Board members raised objections to a proposal to declare library books obsolete and dispose of them; disagreements over which titles should be removed and the librarians' process led the board to withhold approval of item 8.
Board members debated a resolution to declare certain library books “obsolete” and remove them from school library shelves before the board decided not to carry the resolution on June 16.
Board Member Eleonora asked how librarians determine which books are “obsolete.” In response, district staff explained the librarians inventory shelves regularly and recommend removing damaged volumes, out-of-date titles and books that show no recent circulation. Staff said librarians provide the board and public with the lists of titles being removed.
Board Member Christian pressed for more scrutiny and said the public list included relatively recent, award-winning or sensitive books that should not be treated as abandoned. Christian specifically mentioned The Hate U Give (noting its awards and that it is not a decade-old title) and questioned whether books dealing with child safety, online privacy and other topics should be removed solely because they are 10–15 years old. Christian said librarians’ past retirements of books had typically targeted much older items and described concern that some titles were being grouped improperly in the same process.
Board members debated whether the board should review every proposed removal or defer to the professional judgment of the school librarians and building principals. The superintendent said the current policy entrusts librarians, with principal oversight, to inventory and recommend the removal of books based on damage, relevance and circulation. He also said the district could house contested titles in the high school rather than immediately disposing of them.
After discussion, the chair announced: “Item 8 is not carried,” indicating the board would not approve the proposed resolution in its present form and that further direction or a revised policy would be needed before action proceeds.
No formal disposal took place under the June 16 resolution; the district will not proceed with the listed removals as presented. The board asked staff for clearer information on the process and for a proposed approach to address controversial or recently published titles.
