Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Innovation Center Naming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board narrows Innovation Center naming options; asks for student and business feedback
Summary
Trustees reviewed four branding finalists for the future high‑tech learning center at the former eBay site — Nexus, Synergy, Confluence and Wave — and directed administrators to gather additional student, faculty and business feedback before the board’s August meeting.
SANDY, Utah — The Canyons Board of Education reviewed four finalist names for the district’s planned high‑tech learning center and asked the administration to gather targeted student, faculty and business‑advisory feedback before taking a final naming recommendation to the board.
Associate Director of Communications Kirsten Stewart and the district’s steering committee presented four primary options advanced from prior stakeholder work: Nexus (with variations such as “Nextus” or “Nexus Works”), Synergy (including “Synergy Slopes”), Confluence (with shorter modifiers) and Wave (e.g., “Wave Academy” or “WavePoint”). Students who participated in the branding exercises had favored Nexus and Synergy in earlier rounds, the district said.
Stewart reminded trustees that the board has the authority to name buildings and facilities and that the district had engaged students, staff, industry focus groups and a branding firm in the process. Trustees said they wanted to honor student input but also wanted to be confident the final name would serve long term and resonate with business partners and the public.
Several trustees preferred different options: some praised Nexus and its stylized spellings for distinctiveness; others found Synergy too generic; Confluence was described as unique but longer to say; and Wave drew support as evocative of a broader “ripple effect” the center might have across the state.
Trustees directed staff to run small qualitative tests — a short email or focused focus groups — with students who had participated earlier, faculty and a business advisory cohort, and to return a summary to the board in August so the board could decide ahead of fall branding and construction milestones. The board did not make a final naming decision at Tuesday’s meeting.
