Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
St. Paul Park council approves preliminary plat for 61‑lot Geneva Meadows subdivision
Summary
The City of St. Paul Park council voted 5‑0 on June 16 to approve the preliminary plat for a 61‑unit single‑family subdivision (Geneva Meadows) proposed by Lennar on property owned by Gordon Nesvig, subject to engineering comments and a future joint powers agreement with Cottage Grove on a shared right‑of‑way.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City of St. Paul Park council on June 16 approved by a 5‑0 vote a preliminary plat for Geneva Meadows, a proposed 61‑lot single‑family subdivision in the city’s southeastern corner.
Nate, a city planning staff member, told council that the project—proposed by developer Lennar and owned by Gordon Nesvig—would extend Lincoln and Ashland into the site, create a collector alignment with pedestrian accommodations and place 61 single‑family lots consistent with the city’s low‑density residential designation and R‑1 zoning.
Nate said the design meets zoning standards in concept but that several engineering and design comments must be resolved before a final plat can be approved. The staff report lists issues that will need to be addressed at the final‑plat stage, including grading, drainage, utility routing, a proposed lift station, trail connections, and pipeline easement constraints that make the property complex to develop.
One notable outstanding issue is a half‑width right‑of‑way for Geneva that lies adjacent to the site and currently functions as a private roadway; staff said the city is negotiating a draft joint powers agreement with the adjacent City of Cottage Grove to govern the roadway if it is dedicated as public right‑of‑way. Nate said that development securities and a development agreement will be required at final plat; those documents will hold the developer responsible for the infrastructure.
Councilmember Spence moved approval of the preliminary plat; the motion passed 5‑0. Staff said they expect further design adjustments to satisfy the city engineer’s comments and that they will return with the development agreement and final plat for council consideration when those conditions are met.
Why it matters: Approval of the preliminary plat advances a 61‑home development through the city’s land‑use process, but final approvals will require engineering sign‑offs and intergovernmental agreements to resolve right‑of‑way and infrastructure responsibilities.

