Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Billing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners weigh forgiving estimated-billing arrears after meter antenna failures
Summary
Commissioners discussed crediting payments and forgiving unpaid balances on accounts that were billed on estimates after long-running meter antenna failures. Staff were asked to check bond-holder constraints and to return with a recommended policy or ordinance for commission action.
Commissioner Granger raised concerns at a virtual workshop about residential accounts that accumulated large balances after the city's automated meter antennas failed and meters were billed on estimated usage.
Granger said some households have more than $2,000 in arrears tied to estimated billing during the period when antenna replacements were unavailable. He proposed that accounts currently on payment plans that have made payments should have those payments applied as credits to the account and that the remaining estimated balance be forgiven in order to reestablish service and move customers back onto current billing.
Why it matters: the water system operates as an enterprise fund, commissioners said, but failures of city‑owned meter equipment and supply issues contributed to inaccurate billing for some customers. Commissioners framed the question as both a customer‑service and a financial‑management issue: forgiving some arrears can reestablish regular payers and avoid ongoing collection deadlock, but the city must also ensure compliance with bond covenants and fiscal rules.
Commissioners asked staff to consult the city’s bond holders before approving a broad forgiveness program. Jonathan Hayes said the city has two bond holders — the State Revolving Fund (SRF) and a second private bond holder — and asked staff to check whether settling or forgiving arrears would jeopardize the city’s standing under bond covenants. He said legal and finance staff are already reviewing options.
Josh (staff member) noted a draft policy previously brought to the commission limiting how far back estimated adjustments can go: “You can only go back a month,” he said, summarizing the policy approach that had been discussed earlier. Janice (staff member) said she had been investigating a vendor-managed service from Core & Main — the city’s meter vendor — that would shift meter lifecycle replacement and database management to the vendor to reduce future failures. She noted the current AMI (advanced metering infrastructure) system is about 12–14 years old.
No formal motion was made during the workshop. Commissioners directed staff to: (1) consult bond counsel and the two bond holders about the legal effect of crediting and forgiving estimated-billing balances; (2) return an options paper with recommended guardrails and proposed eligibility criteria for any forgiveness program; and (3) obtain a cost estimate from Core & Main on a managed-service arrangement to maintain meters and the meter database.
Ending: Commissioners agreed this is primarily a city-management decision that requires staff legal and financial review. They asked staff to return with a proposed policy and cost estimates so the commission may consider a formal vote in a subsequent meeting.
