Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Appointment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pittsylvania County supervisors appoint Vincent Short as county administrator, 6-1
Summary
The Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors voted 6-1 to appoint Vincent Short as county administrator and approve a staff-prepared employment contract that had drawn concern from one supervisor.
Get email alerts on the Personnel Appointment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors voted 6-1 to appoint Vincent Short as county administrator and to adopt the employment contract presented by county staff.
The motion to appoint Short "on the terms of the contract that's been prepared by county staff" was made by Supervisor Ingram and seconded by Supervisor Haines, according to the meeting record. The motion combined the selection and the contract approval into a single vote.
Board members who spoke during the discussion offered a mix of support and concern. One supervisor said board members had received an email with contract details and told the meeting they had talked with Short and would support him. Supervisor Bowman objected, saying she "was not gonna support this" because the appointment was "wrapped in the contract piece of it" and she was uncomfortable with terms that had surfaced. Several other supervisors said they supported hiring a local administrator and praised Short's ties to the county; Supervisor Vicky Clayton said Short "loves Pittsylvania County" and noted his local roots.
Short, the appointee, addressed the board briefly, saying he was "looking forward to working with you for a few months," and several supervisors urged colleagues to establish good working relationships with the new administrator.
The meeting record shows the motion passed by a tally of six yes votes and one no vote. The board did not record roll-call votes for each member in the provided transcript excerpt; the transcript records at least two named votes (a yes from Miss Little and opposition from Bowman) and indicates the overall 6-1 outcome.
The board moved directly from the vote to other business and adjournment; no additional formal directions to staff or implementation timelines were recorded in the transcript excerpt provided.

