Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Select Board debates who can place items on Brentwood meeting agendas
Summary
Select Board members on June 17 argued over whether the chair alone can control the agenda or whether any member may add items; members agreed to interpret the existing policy to allow members to place items on the agenda and to continue using the established deadline process.
Brentwood, N.H. — Select Board members debated governance and agenda control on June 17 after one member said the chair had previously refused to place an item on the agenda.
The dispute centered on the town's select board meeting policy. One board member cited paragraph 3(a)(1) of the policy: "the select board chair shall maintain order and control of the agenda." Another board member contended that agenda items are scheduled by the town administrator on a generally first-come, first-served basis and that any member should be able to request placement by the published deadline.
The nut graf: The disagreement reflected differing interpretations of "control" of the agenda'whether it means the chair may manage the meeting flow and timing or whether the chair may unilaterally prevent a member from placing an item. After discussion, members agreed that any select board member could submit items for placement by the usual deadline and that the chair's role is to keep the meeting on track, not to block members from adding items.
What happened at the meeting: One member said she had been denied placement of items she wanted (pay-scale, COLA) and asked that the practice be clarified in writing. Other members said the chair had later allowed the topic to be discussed and that the policy already provides a mechanism for a point of order if a member believes the chair acted improperly. A motion that any select board member may add items to the agenda (given the established filing deadline) was made and members indicated agreement with the interpretation that members may add items; the chair said he had no objection to that interpretation.
Why it matters: Clarifying agenda rules affects transparency and public participation; items placed on an agenda allow public notice and opportunity for comment. The board asked staff to maintain the existing filing deadline (noon on the Friday preceding the meeting) and to document the interpretation that members may place items under that timeline.
Next steps: The board did not change the written policy at this meeting but agreed on the floor interpretation and asked staff to note the practice for future agenda processing.
