Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court denies Sparks edition replat over access and utility easement concerns
Summary
Henderson County Commissioners Court denied a proposed replat in the Sparks edition that would split one lot into three, citing a landlocked parcel, lack of utility easements and unclear access across private roads.
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County planning staff and court members raised multiple concerns during review of a proposed replat in the Sparks edition that would split Lot 7 into three lots. Staff described the resulting lot configuration as creating a landlocked parcel with access only across a private feeder road and noted the plat lacked utility easements and building lines.
Planning staff explained that a dedicated 30-foot access shown on the plat conflicted with county subdivision rules because a driveway easement cannot provide access to a lot that does not adjoin a public road. Staff said the Denman Herdt Road segment in the map is private and not county-maintained, leaving one proposed lot without county road frontage.
The court and staff also noted existing structures on the property and advised that a new survey showing the locations of buildings and utilities would assist review. Commissioner Spivens moved to deny the replat application "for the reasons listed" in staff backup; Commissioner Tully seconded and the court denied the replat unanimously.

