Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Teacher Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Prosper ISD shortens appraisal cycle for veteran teachers; board approves T‑TESS changes
Summary
The board approved policy changes allowing eligible teachers to move to a three‑year appraisal cycle; the change keeps goal‑setting, walk‑throughs and documented coaching in non‑appraisal years.
The Prosper ISD Board of Trustees unanimously approved revisions to the district’s teacher appraisal practice and related board policy on June 13, allowing eligible teachers to receive a full summative appraisal once every three years instead of annually.
Administrators said the change is intended to reduce time spent on a single scripted observation and free administrators and teachers to focus on frequent, brief coaching and feedback. Trustees voted in favor on a motion by Mister Linker, seconded by Mister Van Wolf; the vote was 7–0.
Why it matters: Administration and campus leaders told trustees that a single formal observation can require more than two hours of administrator time for the pre‑conference, observation, scoring and post‑conference. The proposed cycle keeps regular goal setting, professional development plans, walk‑throughs and ongoing coaching documented in the district’s evaluation system while moving selected veteran teachers to a “less‑than‑annual” full appraisal.
Key changes and eligibility
- Eligible teachers (category A) are those on term contracts who have completed at least three full school years with Prosper ISD and who do not meet exclusion criteria. Eligible teachers will rotate through a three‑year cycle with one full appraisal year and two non‑appraisal years that include a modified summative conference focused on Domain 4 and goal review.
- Ineligible teachers (category B) include those on probationary contracts (first three years in district), teachers new to the profession, teachers on a plan of support or those who received a rating of “improvement needed” on their last summative appraisal; those teachers will continue to receive a full annual appraisal.
Administrators said all elements in the non‑appraisal years will remain documented in the district’s system (Perform) and that the revision aims to “prioritize people over processes” while keeping meaningful feedback and improvement cycles, language used by Deputy Superintendent Mister McLaughlin during the presentation.
The board directed administration to update local policy language to reflect the exception and to implement training and tracking through the district’s evaluation platform. The motion to approve changes to the teacher appraisal system was made by Mister Linker and seconded by Mister Van Wolf; the vote was unanimous.
What’s next: Administration will revise board policy language and return with implementation guidance and timelines for campus leaders and staff training.
