Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homelessness Shelters topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents, faith leaders urge Louisa County to exempt church warming shelters from CUP process; commission puts humanitarian-shelter language on July agenda
Summary
Dozens of residents, church leaders and members of the Louisa Homeless Coalition urged the Louisa County Planning Commission to exempt short-term, church-hosted “warming shelters” from conditional use permit requirements and to keep regulation as light as possible.
Get email alerts on the Homelessness Shelters topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dozens of residents, church leaders and members of the Louisa Homeless Coalition urged the Louisa County Planning Commission to exempt short-term, church-hosted “warming shelters” from conditional use permit requirements and to keep regulation as light as possible.
The commission voted to place the planning staff’s proposed definition and conditions for a “humanitarian shelter,” along with accompanying zoning-matrix changes, on the agenda for a public hearing at the commission’s July meeting; commissioners also moved to place the matter of vacating the county’s definition of “emergency shelters” on that July public-hearing calendar.
Why it matters: speakers said local volunteers and churches have been providing short-term shelter during winter nights and that requiring a CUP for each host would impose time and cost barriers. “The CUP process is so time consuming and so costly, that’s not beneficial to churches and this group of citizens trying to help homeless people,” said Lynn Kogel, who described research the Louisa Homeless Coalition conducted under HUD point-in-time guidance. Several speakers asked the commission to allow either a single countywide CUP for participating churches or to exempt church-run warming shelters entirely.
Speakers and local groups described the program being discussed as limited in scope. Dwayne Surgeon, speaking for the Louisa Homeless Coalition, described the coalition’s plan as seasonal and small-scale: “These warming shelters we’re proposing would only operate from November through March of the year,” he said, adding that the model uses rotating host churches for one-to-two weeks at a time and works with law enforcement to inform them of shelter locations.
Several faith leaders described providing overnight space and meals this past winter and urged the commission not to impose zoning hurdles. “Feeding the hungry, sheltering the homeless is church work. Please don’t stand in the way of the churches,” said William Scribe (Bill Street), who described his congregation’s experience hosting several people safely. Christina Marshall described the church assistance her own family received, saying the winter sheltering “saved us when temperatures were well below freezing.”
Opponents of a strict CUP regime said cost and process would deter small congregations. Mary Krandys, a resident, cited typical CUP costs she’d heard: “It’s expensive. 3 to $5,000 to apply and a thousand dollars for the advertising. Small churches can’t do that,” she said; staff told the commission the board of supervisors had the authority to waive certain fees in eligible cases.
What commissioners did: Commissioner Goodwin moved that the commission place the proposed humanitarian-shelter definition and zoning-matrix changes on the July agenda and that the commission put on the July public-hearing calendar a proposal to vacate the definition of “emergency shelters.” The motion was seconded and carried on roll call.
Next steps and open questions: Commissioners instructed staff to bring the humanitarian-shelter language and related zoning changes back for the July public hearing. Speakers asked the commission to consider specific exemptions or a single streamlined CUP for faith-based hosts; commissioners did not adopt exemption language at the meeting and left detailed conditions and fee-waiver processes to the July hearing and to board-level actions. Community organizers said they will continue to press for fee waivers, simplified procedures and clearer complaint/neighbor-relations processes if formal rules are adopted.

