Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Jail Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CJCC members warn jail expansion plans may not generate revenue and could raise costs and safety issues
Summary
Members raised concerns that proposals to house state or federal inmates in a future Rusk County jail could increase medical and staffing costs, create security and reentry challenges, and are unlikely to generate the projected revenue given statutory reimbursement rates discussed at the meeting.
Council participants raised a series of cautions about plans the county is exploring to replace or expand its jail, especially proposals to house inmates from state or federal systems as a revenue source.
Several meeting participants said counties that pursue out-of-county contracting have experienced unanticipated costs and operational strain. One participant cited Saint Croix County as a case where a larger facility and contracted inmates later created staffing, medical, and budgeting problems after federal inmates were removed. Participants said such shifts can leave counties with oversized facilities they cannot staff or afford.
Speakers at the meeting discussed several operational concerns: state inmates commonly have more complex medical and behavioral-health needs; transporting and supervising nonlocal inmates increases security and staff demands; family visitation and reentry services can be strained when inmates are housed far from home; and bringing in prison populations may create new community connections that can worsen drug distribution problems.
Meeting remarks included specific cost references cited by participants: a statutory contracted rate for state inmates was described as $60 per day (meeting participants said the county’s internal estimated per-inmate cost was about $140 per day). Participants also discussed current local jail population levels, saying the county’s facility typically operates with roughly 30–38 inmates and that some proposals under consideration describe a facility sized to hold more (participants mentioned a possible 50-bed design as a planning reference). Meeting members cautioned that the state usually contracts for large blocks of beds and that small incremental bed offers are unlikely to be profitable.
Council members asked that the jail project be brought to the CJCC for input so the group can identify potential policy and service impacts before the county finalizes plans. Attendees asked staff for more concrete project information and cost estimates before the CJCC and the public discuss potential expansion or contracting strategies.
No binding decision on the jail project was made at the meeting; participants asked for further information and for CJCC involvement in planning discussions going forward.
