Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Elections office weighs SPLOST inclusion, off‑cycle costs and possible precinct consolidation
Summary
The elections supervisor discussed adding election equipment maintenance to the SPLOST request, outlined the high cost of recent elections and flagged the operational and legal steps needed to consider consolidating precincts or using a single vote center.
Elections Supervisor Tracy (last name not recorded) briefed the board on election costs, the office’s first SPLost request proposal and possible precinct consolidation or use of vote centers to reduce future election expenses.
Tracy said the elections office is proposing that some election‑equipment maintenance and replacement costs be included in the county’s SPLOST proposal, noting counties nearby either include elections costs in general allocations or are pursuing building projects for elections offices. She provided a six‑year equipment and maintenance cost projection for voting machines, scanners, license fees and maintenance and said any future change to statewide voting systems could alter obligations between the state and counties. She told commissioners the county is under a 20‑year contract for the current voting system implemented in 2020 and warned that a newly elected secretary of state could change the statewide system; the state covers system costs it mandates but counties would remain responsible for amounts above state‑provided standards.
Tracy also outlined the operational costs of the current election cycle: roughly 24,000 registered voters in the county, more than 175 voters at one early‑voting snapshot, and total election staffing and operations costs she estimated at about $125,000 for the current election period; she said off‑cycle elections and potential runoffs would add further expense and that some counties are exploring one‑location vote centers on election day if early‑voting and turnout thresholds permit. Tracy noted legal thresholds: to use a single voting center on election day a county must meet statutory criteria (for example, small turnout percentages and other safeguards) and she said a decision to consolidate would require public hearings and mapping of impacts.
Tracy asked the board to consider including election equipment funding in the SPLOST package and offered to provide proposals for consolidation options that meet legal requirements, and detailed cost comparisons. Commissioners discussed whether some election costs are routine maintenance versus capital purchases and whether items should be budgeted under SPLOST or the general fund.
Ending: The board asked staff and the elections office to provide detailed cost breakdowns and legal analysis about consolidation and SPLOST inclusion before any final decision.
