Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Affordability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Conference conferees adopt single durational affordability requirement for S.127
Summary
House conferees agreed to accept the Senate'proposed durational requirement that affordability covenants remain in effect until all project indebtedness is retired, applying the requirement to both owner'occupied and rental housing in the S.127 omnibus housing bill.
Get email alerts on the Housing Affordability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House and Senate conferees working on S.127, the omnibus housing bill, agreed to apply a single durational affordability requirement across owner-occupied and rental housing, keeping affordability in place until a project's indebtedness is retired.
The agreement, presented by John Gray of the Office of Legislative Council, covers the affordability contract and the moderate-income housing development provisions in the draft and adopts the Senate's durational requirement rather than the House's previous, distinct owner-occupied and rental approach.
The change appears on pages 3 and 4 of the draft. "The first thing to note is in our affordability contract, the house is acceding to the senate's durational requirement for the affordability piece," John Gray said, adding the same durational language was picked up in the moderate-income housing-development section.
Under the agreed language, any housing unit covered by the affordability requirement must be offered exclusively as a primary residence until all indebtedness for the housing infrastructure project of which that housing development is part has been retired. Conferees described the change as a consolidation of earlier two-pronged language into a single durational sentence to apply uniformly across housing categories.
Committee members flagged that the applied durational requirement shifts responsibilities to municipalities and municipal housing departments in implementing contract terms and enforcement. One committee member noted the change "applies the same durational requirement that the senate had proposed for rental housing also to owner occupied," and that is why the draft now contains one consolidated sentence rather than two separate prongs.
Conferees did not adopt additional, alternative durational language at this meeting; the record shows the house proposal was revised to match the senate durational standard and that the consolidated language now appears in the working conference draft. No formal vote or final enactment occurred during the session; the committee continued negotiating other provisions and offered to circulate an edited conference report for review.

