Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pride Flag And Ribbons topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake Bluff trustees hear pleas to raise Pride flag; staff to permit temporary parkway ribbons
Summary
Dozens of residents urged Lake Bluff trustees to fly a Pride flag during June; the board did not vote to change flagpole policy but directed staff to permit temporary ribbons on parkway trees for 14 days while a formal display policy is developed.
Get email alerts on the Pride Flag And Ribbons topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dozens of residents urged the Village of Lake Bluff’s Committee of the Whole on June 9 to raise a Pride flag during June, but trustees did not adopt a policy change for the village flagpoles. Instead, village staff told the board they will accept applications to place ribbons on parkway trees for a limited period while the board develops a formal display policy.
The public comment period drew sustained testimony from residents about mental health risks for LGBTQ youth and the symbolic value of visible municipal support. Mary Cole, a former trustee, told the board she supported a visible celebration but warned that trustees must avoid being forced to approve similar symbolic requests “in perpetuity.” Kelly Jeremias, a Lake Bluff resident, asked trustees to “please fly the flag,” saying, “Flying the pride flag is not a political statement. It’s a human one.”
Village Attorney Peter Freeman told the meeting that First Amendment law and recent federal court decisions shape how municipalities treat flags and other displays on public property. “The Free Speech clause in the Amendment says Congress shall make no law prohibiting or abridging the freedom of speech,” Freeman said, explaining that municipalities may impose reasonable, content-neutral time, place and manner rules for private speech on government property, but that government-owned flags and displays are treated differently as government speech.
Freeman said the legal distinction matters for how Lake Bluff manages requests. If the village owns and controls a flagpole and its flags, the board can exercise discretion about what that pole displays; if the flagpole functions as a public forum where private groups place their own flags, the village must treat requests more neutrally. He also cited a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision involving city flagpoles in Boston as a cautionary example (case not named in the meeting).
Board members and staff described options that would allow visible community support while the board finishes a formal policy. Village Administrator Drew (staff) told trustees that the existing special-events process can accommodate private groups seeking to hold events on the Village Green and that, for the ribbon proposal, staff would grant temporary permits limited to parkway trees and a 14-day display period, with the applicant responsible for removal. He said staff could remove leftover ribbons after that window.
Trustee discussion reflected differing views: some trustees said they favored immediate, symbolic action and supported ribbons or a short-term flag posting; others said they wanted more detailed policy work before authorizing government-owned flag displays. Trustee Raffy (last name not provided) and several residents urged a quick, visible response; Trustee Steve (last name not provided) and others emphasized crafting a lasting, content-neutral policy that defines which flagpoles and which groups are included.
The village also confirmed two practical points that shaped the debate: the village’s special-events application has been used for years as a content-neutral mechanism for group events on the Village Green, and allowing parkway ribbons under a staff permit would differ legally from the village itself sponsoring a flag on municipal poles.
Trustees said they will continue work on a display policy. The board set follow-up consideration for its next regular meeting on June 23 (6:00 p.m.). In the meantime, staff said it will accept and act on ribbon permit applications for parkway trees for 14 days, and applicants will be responsible for removal at the end of the period.
The meeting opened with a routine approval of Committee of the Whole minutes from May 28 by voice vote earlier in the agenda.
Ending: Trustees said they want to finalize a clearer display policy that addresses which poles, what rules, and who is eligible to have government-supported displays, while encouraging community members to use available permits and the Village Green special-events process to stage private observances in the near term.

