House subcommittee hears bipartisan proposals to shore up rural housing supply and preserve USDA-backed rentals

Summary

Witnesses and members at a House Financial Services subcommittee hearing described higher per‑unit construction costs, thin private capital, and administrative barriers as central to rural housing shortages and urged targeted reforms to USDA Rural Housing Service programs, tax credits and permitting to preserve and build homes in smaller towns.

The House Financial Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance held a hearing titled "Housing in the Heartland: Addressing Our Rural Housing Needs" where members and witnesses described a pattern of higher construction costs, limited contractor and lender capacity, and regulatory burdens that together shrink housing supply in rural communities.

The hearing’s chair, Chairman Flood, opened the session by framing four federal requirements he called the “four horsemen of the housing apocalypse”: lengthy environmental reviews, Build America, Buy America procurement rules, Davis‑Bacon prevailing‑wage and reporting requirements, and Section 3 hiring preferences. He said those federal requirements, while well intentioned, “significantly drive up costs of projects using federal dollars.”

Why it matters: Rural communities house about one in five Americans and face a confluence of problems—aging housing stock, higher per‑unit delivery costs for materials and labor, limited access to private capital, and thin public‑sector administrative capacity—that threaten existing affordable housing and make new production more expensive.

Witnesses from the banking, advocacy and nonprofit housing sectors described overlapping solutions. Richard Beyer, president and CEO of the Nebraska Bankers Association, detailed Nebraska’s state workforce…

House subcommittee hears bipartisan proposals to shore up rural housing supply and preserve USDA-backed rentals

Summary

Subscribe to keep reading