Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Boulder council convenes and authorizes two executive sessions on downtown real-estate negotiations and federal sanctuary-city legal advice
Summary
Boulder City Council on June 12 authorized two executive sessions: one as the Downtown Commercial District board to discuss a potential downtown real-property transaction and another to receive legal advice on federal administrative actions related to sanctuary-city policies.
The Boulder City Council on June 12 voted to suspend its normal rule prohibiting votes under the "Matters" portion of its agenda and then authorized two separate executive sessions.
First, acting as the Downtown Commercial District board of directors (formerly the Central Area General Improvement District), the council convened a closed executive session to discuss a potential purchase, acquisition, lease, transfer or sale of real property in the downtown commercial district and to develop negotiation strategy and instruct negotiators. The city cited the Colorado Open Meetings Act authority for such sessions: CRS §24-6-402(4)(a) (real-property transactions) and §24-6-402(4)(e) (determining positions relative to negotiations). The motion to convene that executive session passed by the two-thirds threshold required for executive-session votes and the session was held; council reported that no improper matters were raised on the public record after the session concluded and then reconvened as the city council.
Second, later in the same meeting the council convened an executive session under CRS §24-6-402(4)(b) to receive legal advice about representing the city regarding emerging federal administrative actions concerning sanctuary-city policies. That motion also passed by the two-thirds requirement, the council recessed into the closed session and later reconvened and stated on the public record that no unauthorized matters had been discussed.
Both executive sessions were recorded in the public minutes as having been convened and concluded, and council listed the participants in the sessions on the public record after each session ended. No substantive details of negotiations or legal advice were disclosed in open session because the matters are explicitly authorized for confidential discussion under the state open-meetings statute.
Ending: The council signaled on the public record that both executive sessions were completed and that no unlawful or extraneous matters were discussed. Where required, the council recorded participants for the public minutes and will continue any necessary follow-up in closed session or in subsequent public items as appropriate.
