Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Streets And Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City pauses 2026 roadway rehabilitation project after residents raise assessment, drainage and trail concerns
Summary
The council heard detailed plans for the 2026 neighborhood roadway rehabilitation — including an 850-foot trail gap closure, drain-tile installations and utility realignments — but tabled final action after residents asked for more transparency on assessments and service charges.
Get email alerts on the Streets And Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City engineers presented the proposed 2026 roadway rehabilitation program on June 11, describing planned pavement replacement, spot curb repairs, select sanitary and water-main work, drain-tile installation to address chronic yard drainage, and a proposal to narrow Afton Road to make room for an 8-foot trail.
Project manager Colton said the city identified several neighborhoods for improvements — Ridgegate, Straits Farm, Woodbury On The Park, Overlook Point and Boulder Ridge — and provided condition data showing a neighborhood pavement-condition index averaging about 54 and an Afton Road average index near 31. The preliminary project estimate is about $8.8 million, with roughly $2.2 million (about 25 percent) proposed as special assessments to affected properties. Colton outlined typical assessment amounts presented in the draft feasibility report: single-family homes roughly $3,700; multifamily units roughly $2,500; about 14 parcels would face an additional utility-service assessment near $3,100; and Afton Road parcels would see assessments varying by lot size, with some estimates from about $4,700 to $9,400.
Residents at the hearing raised questions about landscape restoration, snow removal responsibilities for new trails, the location of relocated utility poles, and how assessments are calculated. John Johnson (Afton Road) asked why the new trail would include a boulevard rather than sit adjacent to the curb; staff answered that a boulevard moves poles and utilities closer to the roadway and provides a separation buffer for pedestrians. Mike Moore (High Point Road) asked about a previously cut irrigation and monument electrical line; staff said responsibility for irrigation and electrical within the right-of-way typically lies with the homeowners or HOA unless otherwise determined, and recommended addressing repairs when the city performs reconstruction.
Several residents and council members asked for clearer address-level assessment tables so property owners can see exactly what their proposed charges would be. Council member Wilson asked staff to provide updated feasibility documentation tied to low-bid numbers; after extended discussion the council voted to table the project to the next meeting so staff can provide more detailed assessment transparency and for the council to consider updated reports.
The council’s tabling vote passed 3–1 with Council member Wilson opposed; one council seat was absent. Staff said they will produce a more detailed assessment roll and consider whether to include updated feasibility figures in the public packet ahead of the next hearing. Colton and Public Works staff also reiterated that residents will have options for a 30‑day no-interest payment window after assessment adoption and a longer 15‑year repayment option through property taxes if homeowners prefer to spread payments.

