Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Calming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs resident requests for seasonal speed cushions amid enforcement and safety concerns
Summary
Residents requested temporary summer speed bumps on neighborhood streets; council and staff cautioned that seasonal or permanent traffic-calming devices require engineering warrants, can impede emergency vehicles and often prompt requests across many neighborhoods, so staff will outline criteria and costs before any installation.
A resident request for temporary summer speed cushions prompted a council discussion about traffic calming, enforcement limits and the borough's standards for installing devices on borough roads.
Why it matters: traffic-calming requests are frequent and affect response times for emergency vehicles, road maintenance and municipal liability; the council sought to balance neighborhood livability with safety and enforceability.
Discussion highlights: council members and the chief said temporary rubber speed cushions can cause vehicle damage, create disputes between neighbors and impede emergency response. Staff and council described the practical and legal steps required to implement such measures: a formal request process, an engineering study to meet warrants (grades, distance from intersections, sightlines, posted speed), PennDOT compliance where applicable, and clear signage.
Council members also noted enforcement limits: electronic speed displays and patrols can deter speeding but do not substitute for engineering-based solutions; municipal staff said placement often triggers further neighborhood requests and that a boroughwide policy and cost/maintenance plan are needed before installations.
Next steps: staff said they would assemble guidance on criteria, probable costs and the PennDOT/warrant process, and roll out options such as temporary deployment of the radar speed trailer or an engineering study if the neighborhood wishes to advance a formal request. No installations were authorized at the meeting.
Ending: council asked staff to communicate the process to the requesting residents and to return with cost and procedural recommendations at a future meeting.
