Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tornado Recovery Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board committee advances $30 million tornado relief fund after hours of public testimony

3805783 · June 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

St. Louis Board of Aldermen committee moved Board Bill 31 out of committee, creating a Tornado Relief and Recovery Fund funded by interest on the city's "Grama settlement"; public speakers urged faster, larger, and more equitable spending, especially for North City neighborhoods.

President Megan Green and the Housing, Urban Development and Zoning Committee advanced Board Bill 31 on a committee vote Tuesday night, sending the measure to the full Board of Aldermen with an amendment. The bill would establish a Tornado Relief and Recovery Fund, to be set up by the comptroller and maintained by the city treasurer, and direct $30,000,000 in interest earned on the —Grama settlement— into immediate recovery work.

The bill's sponsors say the interest-driven fund is intended to deliver quick relief for residents and organizations after the city's May 16 tornado. "This conversation around Board Bill 31 tonight is a start. It's not the finish," President Megan Green told the committee before public comment, and she said the committee intends to move the bill quickly so the funds can supplement FEMA and state aid. Green noted FEMA's designation and a 25% matching requirement the city must meet to access full federal assistance.

The bill would allow the fund to pay for temporary housing, emergency home repairs, storage for belongings, help with insurance deductibles, legal aid, repairs to public infrastructure (streets, sidewalks, lighting, hazardous trees), and support for nonprofits providing shelter and staffing. Private donations and other appropriations could be placed in the fund; interest earned on the account would remain available for relief and recovery. The measure caps city administrative spending on the fund at 5%, while explicitly allowing nonprofits to use money for staffing and supplies.

Committee members and staff said the mayor's office will administer the fund and provide monthly reports to the Board of Aldermen on expenditures and outcomes. The bill also includes an exhibit listing neighborhoods identified by aerial surveillance as most impacted; sponsors said the list is not final and urged residents to report missing neighborhoods for inclusion.

Public testimony, which filled much of the hearing, pressed elected officials to expand the proposed response and to ensure funds flow quickly and equitably. Rachel Hurtado of the grassroots People's Response, who said her group has served more than 5,000 impacted families, supported the bill but urged that the city avoid delaying relief: "This fund cannot operate like the city rental assistance program or take as long as the Impacted Tenants Fund has taken to stand up," Hurtado said, adding that out-of-state property managers had already locked displaced residents out of buildings and threatened to discard belongings.

Speakers representing neighborhood groups, relief organizations and residents repeatedly asked the committee to prioritize North and West Side neighborhoods and to use every available city resource, including reserves and other settlement funds. Wale Musa of the Community Justice Coalition and the Campaign for Human Dignity said $30 million is far smaller than needs residents described, and urged the board to consider the full pool of available money. "You cannot begin to allocate resources when there is no determination of the scope," Musa said, calling for a detailed, neighborhood-by-neighborhood assessment before spending.

Nonprofit and neighborhood leaders urged that trusted local groups be paid and included in program design. Kayla Reed, executive director of Action St. Louis and co-anchor of the People's Response hub, told the committee her organization had helped collect more than 8,000 resident assessments and had identified more than 3,200 households reporting significant home damage. "$30,000,000 is a start. It's not enough," Reed said, noting volunteers and local groups remain the primary source of immediate help and must be supported to sustain operations.

Committee members and President Green said FEMA assistance must remain the first line for certain individual benefits and described how the city's fund is intended to fill gaps. Green gave a brief summary of FEMA individual assistance items and timelines during the hearing: she said applicants can receive up to $770 for emergency needs and up to $43,600 for home repair and other eligible costs, and she urged residents to file FEMA forms so the city can coordinate gap funding.

After the public comment period the committee voted to move the bill forward. The motion was made by Alderman Collins and seconded by Alderman Browning; the clerk called the roll and the bill passed out of committee that evening. Sponsors said the measure will be read and perfected at the Board of Aldermen's next meeting and that a special full Board meeting has been scheduled to finalize passage and send the bill to the mayor for signature.

Committee and community speakers stressed multiple outstanding issues the city must resolve during implementation: how neighborhoods will be added to the impacted list, what specific eligibility and allocation formulas will be used, how oversight and transparency will be enforced, and whether the city will tap additional sources of funding beyond interest on the settlement. Several commenters urged the board to build contracting and hiring processes that prioritize local contractors and Black-owned businesses and to guard against price gouging by out-of-town vendors.

The committee's action moves the bill closer to creating a standing fund intended to deliver short-term stabilization (shelter, repairs, supplies) while leaving the door open to additional, longer-term reconstruction funding decisions. Committee sponsors and many public commenters said they view the proposed $30 million as an initial tranche, not the final investment, and asked the Board of Aldermen and the mayor to pursue larger sums and to center community-led organizations in administering relief.

Ending note: Committee members asked residents to continue reporting missing neighborhoods and to participate in future oversight by reviewing monthly reports once the fund is active; sponsors said they will press for speed and transparency as the bill moves toward full Board approval and the mayor's signature.