Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater Drainage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reviews draft drainage study for downtown Manor; staff to return with budget timing
Summary
The council reviewed a proposed statement of work for a Manor downtown drainage study to analyze conveyance and regional detention options; staff presented a three‑tier cost structure and a community‑engagement alternate and council voted to postpone final approval to allow additional budget discussion.
The council considered a proposed drainage study for Manor’s downtown to create a model of stormwater flows and to evaluate conveyance versus regional detention solutions.
Scope and purpose: the study, presented by GBA consultant representatives and supported by Public Works staff, would inventory drainage conditions, develop a hydraulic model, evaluate early‑release versus detention strategies and produce conceptual designs for conveyance or regional detention as needed. The study area covers downtown from US 290 southward to the Bridal/Blake/Manor corridor and between Gilliland and Wilbarger creek flood plains.
Costs and options: staff presented three cost options. A full scope including preliminary design and potential regional‑detention alternatives was quoted at about $338,987; excluding the regional‑detention preliminary design reduced the cost; a further alternate excluded a community‑engagement package, lowering the price again. The community‑engagement alternate in the proposal includes workshops, stakeholder meetings and outreach events; council members asked that outreach be included in scoping if feasible.
Council direction and timing: several council members asked whether the item could wait until the June 4 meeting to align with outstanding budget discussions; staff said funding for the study is already allocated across this year and next in departmental budgets and that a short postponement would not create an immediate public‑safety threat. Councilwoman Hill moved to postpone the item to the June 4 council meeting and the motion passed unanimously.
Local concerns: council members asked that study recommendations include maintenance actions (ditch cleaning, culvert clearance) and highlight specific problem areas for near‑term work so residents impacted by recurring ponding see progress. Staff noted some areas are costly to retrofit (road lowering and utility relocation) and that targeted conveyance/maintenance solutions may be more practical for select locations.
