Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tree Removal Draining First National topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff: trees removed at First National Bank site were under 14-inch threshold; bank pursuing landscaping and drainage fixes
Summary
Planning staff told the commission trees removed in front of the First National Bank site were under the 14-inch diameter threshold cited in code at the time, and that the property owner is implementing landscaping, brick pavers and an absorption (French) drain to address runoff and site issues.
Get email alerts on the Tree Removal Draining First National topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff updated the commission on trees removed at the First National Bank property and said the removals complied with the city’s tree-size threshold that applied at the time.
Staff said the trees were “under 14 inches” so the tree-preservation threshold did not apply, and that trees were removed after concerns about paving upheaval, irrigation damage and declining tree health. “It was an overall beautification project,” staff said, describing new brick pavers, flowerpots and a proposed French drain/absorption bed intended to handle runoff created by the changes.
Staff told the commission the work was being done by the property owner (the bank or the parking-lot owner) and that First National Bank was funding landscaping, sign replacements and other aesthetic improvements. Ownership of the land was discussed in the meeting and not fully resolved on the record; staff twice noted uncertainty about the precise owner of the parcel but said the bank is paying for the improvements.
Commissioners asked about drainage and runoff. Staff said the work disturbed less than 5,000 square feet, and so a separate drainage plan was not required under the rules staff cited; to address runoff the project includes a gravel absorption bed and a French-drain feature intended to capture and infiltrate water.
No enforcement action, permit revocation or formal penalties were discussed at the meeting; staff presented the information as an update and described continuing coordination between the city and the property owner on landscape and drainage details.

