Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Health Jurisdiction topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Aldermen amend public-health-officer ordinance to resolve county-designation gap

3800045 · June 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board approved an ordinance amending city code section 105.080 to clarify designation of public health officers after staff described a jurisdictional gap between Clay and Platte counties affecting new development.

The Smithville Board of Aldermen approved an ordinance amending section 105.080 of the city code to revise how the city designates public health officers, voting 5-0 on Bill 3064-25.

Alderman Rankins moved the ordinance on first reading; Alderman Merrill seconded. During discussion Rankins asked staff whether additional coordination with Platte County would be required going forward. A staff member identified as Jack explained that the change arose because a property developing in the city involved areas where Clay County had previously been the sole designee, but the new development required interaction with Platte County for septic permits. Jack said, "So now that it's actually developing and we've got permits on it, they've gotta get a septic system. Platte County won't do it because it it says Clay. Clay won't do it because it's not in Clay."

The exchange indicated the ordinance change seeks to resolve a jurisdictional mismatch for public-health-officer designation where portions of city property interface with neighboring counties. The clerk recorded aye votes from Aldermen Kabilski, Russell, Atkins, Wilson and Hartman, and the ordinance was read into the record: "An ordinance amending section 105.080 of the code of ordinances regarding designating of public health officers for the city of Smith Ville."

The transcript shows the board passed the amendment; it does not record intergovernmental agreements, specific operational steps, or a required implementation timeline. The transcript also contains a small typographical clarification during unrelated plat discussion that referenced the phrase "does not substantially deviate" versus "did not deviate," which staff called a typographical error; that clarification did not change the board's vote on the health-officer ordinance.