Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews social-emotional climate policy draft; members and students discuss 'equity' and anti-racism language
Summary
The board reviewed a required Washington State policy draft on social-emotional climate (policy 3112) and questioned procedural language about 'equity focus' and 'anti-racism.' Staff said the draft is a work in progress and invited suggested wording changes; students and staff described recent local anti-racism activities.
The Prosser School District board reviewed draft policy 3112 on social-emotional climate on June 11, with discussion focused on definitions of "equity" and references to practicing anti-racism in schools.
Deanna (Staff member) said policy 3112 is a state-required policy and that the district’s MTSS team had reviewed and recommended it move forward. A board member asked whether a separate "equity focus" line item was necessary. Deanna explained the draft distinguishes "equity" — the idea that students should receive what they need to reach their potential — from "equity focus," which the procedure defines as strategies aimed at improving outcomes for students and adults with attention to protected classes.
Board members probed the phrase that the policy should "offer frequent opportunities for students to discuss and practice anti racism and develop collaborative solutions to address inequities." One board member asked for clarification on "practicing anti-racism." Deanna pointed to local activities and cited a student trip to a regional forum (CELA) and described the policy language as intended to promote education about why certain words and actions are harmful.
Student board representatives said feedback on recent events had been largely positive and expressed support for continued educational efforts. Deanna said the draft is open to amendment and asked for input on wording where board members felt clarification or rephrasing would better convey the district’s intent.
The board did not vote on final adoption; staff said the policy and procedures will return in later meetings for further review and possible edits based on board and community input.
