Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cra Grant Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tampa CRA narrows historic-review scope, revises grant rules on alcohol-related businesses and interior work
Summary
The CRA board voted to limit the architectural/historic preservation review for structures older than 50 years, remove a blanket disqualification for restaurants deriving more than 50% of revenue from alcohol, align the commercial interior grant with Florida Statute Chapter 163, and modify repayment proration for short-term transfers.
The Tampa CRA board on Wednesday approved multiple policy clarifications affecting commercial grants and historic-preservation review.
Staff presented five guideline items as part of a policy update planned for July. After discussion, the board voted to limit the city’s architectural and historic preservation review for structures older than 50 years to a determination of whether restoration or reconstruction is required, rather than directing detailed material- or finish-level prescriptions. The motion passed after board discussion that the city’s historic-review body should make demolition/restoration determinations and that the CRA should not itself adopt technical preservation rules.
The board also voted to remove the policy language that barred restaurants deriving more than 50% of gross revenue from alcohol sales from CRA grant eligibility. That motion passed with one recorded opposing vote (Councilman Carlson) and one member absent for the vote (Board member Miranda). The board separately declined to add liquor stores, beer/wine retailers, breweries or similar primarily alcoholic‑beverage retailers to the list of ineligible business types.
On interior grants, the board instructed staff to revise the commercial interior grant so reimbursable improvements are limited to those necessary to meet building-code compliance, aligning the program with Florida Statute Chapter 163. Supporters described the change as a way to prioritize bringing underused commercial spaces to code so they can be reactivated by tenants.
Repayment terms and restrictive covenants
The board voted to remove proration language from repayment requirements tied to five-year restrictive covenants: if a grant recipient sells or transfers the property to a tax-exempt government or nonprofit within five years of disbursement, the CRA will require full reimbursement rather than a prorated share for remaining months in the five-year term. For larger grants (above the threshold staff noted, typically over $150,000), the existing 10‑year restriction and proration rules will remain but will be adjusted in drafting so proration applies after year five.
Implementation and next steps
Staff will incorporate the board’s directions into the July policy update. Dee Reid, economic development coordinator, led the presentation and read each guideline and the original intent before the board’s votes. Board members asked staff and legal counsel to ensure the revised rules are practical to administer and align with existing city processes.
The changes affect how the CRA evaluates façade, interior and special-projects grant requests going forward and will be reflected in the draft policy brought back to the board.
