Tampa VRB approves rear-setback reduction to allow two‑story accessory unit above detached garage

The City of Tampa Variance Review Board on June 10 approved a variance to reduce the rear-yard setback at 2715 North Ridgewood Avenue from 20 feet to 10 feet, allowing the property owner to add a second-story accessory dwelling unit (ADU) above an existing detached garage.

The board granted the variance after the petitioner, Chris Akins, said the proposal would not change the garage footprint and that the additional unit is intended to provide living space for extended family. Staff said the property is in an area where ADUs are permitted and referenced the RS-50 district standards in section 27-1-56 (Table 4‑2) of the city code.

Planning staff presented the site plan, noted prior permit activity tied to driveway expansion, and summarized departmental comments: Natural Resources recommended conditions related to canopy pruning because the two‑story addition would be under an existing tree canopy; Transportation, wastewater, water and right‑of‑way review returned inconsistent findings; Stormwater noted conditions for drainage; and TICO offered no comment. Staff also said a signed, sealed land survey showing the proposed sketch would be required for permitting.

The petitioner, Chris Akins, identified himself as the project agent and confirmed he and the owner, Marco, had been sworn. Akins said the current one‑story garage would remain in footprint and be elevated to a two‑story accessory unit to house family members; he added the structure meets square‑footage and height requirements for an ADU, pending the setback relief.

The board discussed the application briefly and then moved to approve the variance as presented. The motion found that the applicant presented competent and substantial evidence at the hearing and referenced the five hardship criteria in section 27‑80 of the city code. The board recorded a voice vote in favor and the motion passed.

Next steps: if the applicant proceeds with construction, staff said the project will need to meet the canopy‑pruning condition and submit the required sealed survey and building permits. If the variance is approved, it will expire two years from the decision date unless a permit is pulled or the decision is appealed.