Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Policy Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board opens broader policy review after public push for enumerated protections and display limits
Summary
After more than an hour of public comment urging explicit protections and clearer rules about classroom displays, the Johnston County Board of Education sent proposed revisions to discrimination, display and social-media policies back to the policy committee for further drafting.
Members of the public and civil-rights groups pressed the Johnston County Board of Education on June 10 to preserve or expand explicit nondiscrimination language in district policy and to clarify rules governing materials displayed in classrooms.
A policy package under review includes draft revisions to:
- Policy 17.10 (Discrimination, Harassment and Bullying), - Policy 52.10 (Distribution and Display of Non‑School Materials), and - Policy 43.13 (Student Use of Social Networking Sites).
Several members of the public urged the board to retain enumerated protections for specific classes in policy language — including race, disability and sexual orientation/gender identity — rather than replacing the enumerations with a general statement. Reverend Christopher Carnegie, representing the NAACP, asked the board to conduct a compliance audit and increase transparency and data reporting. Other speakers sought protections for natural hairstyles under the Crown Act and asked that local policy match Durham and Wake counties’ approaches.
Board members and staff debated a proposed draft for 52.10 that would limit classroom displays to materials that represent the United States, the state of North Carolina, the county, the school mascot and approved curriculum, along with family photos, student art and military flags. Some board members raised concerns that the draft could be read as singling out particular symbols such as pride flags and asked the policy committee to review the language for clarity and enforceability.
Legal and policy staff noted that the district had previously included statutory cross-references to North Carolina law (cited in discussion as the statutory provision governing school harassment and bullying) and that the drafting team had considered executive-branch guidance. Board members asked the policy committee to reconvene Thursday morning to refine language and said the items will return to the full board for further reading and possible action.
