Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Court Services Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve $230,024.70 to fully fund court services contract, opt to use general fund reserve over JUUL settlement funds
Summary
Oklahoma County Commissioners voted to approve full-year funding for the county's court services contract totaling $230,024.70 and decided to take the money from the general fund reserve after declining to use JUUL settlement funds.
Get email alerts on the Court Services Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Oklahoma County Board of Commissioners on June 6 voted to fully fund the county's court services contract for the year in the amount of $230,024.70 and decided that the payment will come from the general fund reserve rather than from JUUL settlement (one-time) funds.
The item was introduced by a member of the board who also brought forward representatives from county justice offices: Vicky Behenna, identified in the meeting as the district attorney; Paul Timmons, jail administrator; and Bridget Biffle, public defender. Chris Steele also attended representing related operations, and Jim Holman, described in the meeting as a member of the jail trust, was present in support.
Board discussion focused on the source of funding. One commissioner noted the county had received approximately $320,000 in the referenced dual settlement (JUUL) funds and asked whether the contract payment should come from those one-time funds or from the general fund reserve. Another commissioner expressed concern about using one-time settlement dollars to fund recurring, ongoing obligations, saying that historical practice counseled against using one-time funds for recurring expenses. The board considered a motion to fund the contract from the JUUL settlement funds; that motion did not pass. A subsequent motion to fund the contract from the general fund reserve passed on voice vote.
The meeting transcript records a motion to approve the amount ($230,024.70) and later votes on the funding source: proponents of using the JUUL funds moved that course and the motion failed; the board then moved to take the money out of the general fund reserve and approved that option. The transcript does not record a roll-call tally for the failed motion or the final vote; the recording shows voice votes of "Aye" for approval of the general reserve option.
Commissioners discussed fiscal prudence and preserving one-time settlement dollars for future unforeseen needs while using available reserves for this year's contractual obligation. The board indicated the approval ensures continuity of court services for the county for the coming year.

