Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation Admin topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic Preservation Agency reviews administratively approved minor COAs; no board action required
Summary
At its June 10 meeting the Historic Preservation Agency (HPA) received an informational briefing from planning staff on administratively approved Certificates of Appropriateness (COAs) for several properties; no board action was required.
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation Admin topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At its June 10 meeting the Historic Preservation Agency (HPA) received an informational briefing from planning staff on administratively approved Certificates of Appropriateness (COAs) for several properties; no board action was required.
Staff member Robert Angelo reviewed the minor projects that were processed administratively under Section 10 of the City’s Land Development Regulations: COA25‑10 at 4268 SE Camp Street (siding repairs, repainting, gutter replacement, and soffit/fascia repair using matching materials and colors); COA25‑11 at 403 SE St. John Street (replacement of an existing shingle roof with a galvalume metal roof consistent with district character); COA25‑13 at 409 SE Brown Street (like‑for‑like shingle roof replacement); and COA25‑14 at 322 S Marion (removal of a palm tree encroaching into power lines for safety reasons).
Agency members asked several clarifying questions. One member asked whether the metal roof at 403 SE St. John had already been installed; Angelo said it had been done “for a little while” and that the administrative approval preceded the prior meeting packet because of timing. Agency members also discussed the local code language that allows metal roofs where they are consistent with the district and confirmed that the 2019 text amendment governs that administrative review process.
When asked about potential conflicts of interest, a board member noted for the record that one of the properties discussed was his own, and staff confirmed that because the briefing covered administrative determinations and no formal action was being taken, a recusal was not required. The HPA had no workshop items and adjourned the meeting after the briefing.
The administrative approvals summarize routine preservation‑district maintenance and safety work; applicants will proceed under the administrative COA process and must comply with the materials and design consistency conditions noted by staff.

