Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cemetery Title Search topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission says certified title search needed before Newtown Cemetery work; ground‑penetrating radar planned afterward
Summary
The Nantucket Cemetery Commission was told a certified title search is needed to define legal bounds for Newtown Cemetery before physical work can proceed; commissioners said ground‑penetrating radar (GPR) would follow formal action and a warrant article process.
The Nantucket Cemetery Commission discussed the legal and procedural steps needed to formalize Newtown Cemetery’s boundaries and pursue on‑the‑ground work, including a certified title search and a future ground‑penetrating radar survey.
Commissioners said the certified title would identify the “meets and bounds” the town can rely on to avoid later title challenges. Vicky Marsh, town council, and other commissioners noted the conservative approach is intended to prevent claims from any parties who might assert ownership and to give the Select Board and Town Council confidence when a warrant article is considered.
Commissioners discussed timing and process: once the title search is certified, the usual path is for an appropriate town committee or planning board to recommend a warrant article, the Select Board to approve the article, and then placement on a town meeting warrant. Commissioners cautioned that even with a certified title, much of the fieldwork cannot start until the town’s formal approvals are in place.
Commissioners also said that ground‑penetrating radar would be the next technical step for portions of the cemetery “that we’ve never been able to look into.” They described GPR as likely to occur in the fall when logistics (including boat reservations for island work) are easier. Commissioners emphasized this is a multi‑step process requiring town approvals and careful sequencing rather than immediate construction work.
Commissioners asked that title search results be shared with the commission when available so members can see the recorded findings and the recommended meets and bounds. No formal votes to authorize work were taken at the meeting; participants described the discussion as planning and confirmation of next steps.
The commission also noted scheduling constraints for town meetings and the possibility of a special town meeting in the fall; however, members said they were not hearing that a special town meeting was imminent. The commission committed to keeping the item on its docket and to sharing title search results with members when they arrive.
