Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Technology topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Emporia board reviews draft AI policy; committee recommends definitions, training and yearly updates

3783568 · June 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members heard a reading of a draft generative‑AI policy that adds definitions, professional development requirements and acceptable‑use guidance for students and staff; the board emphasized training and annual review and will return to the item for a formal vote.

The Emporia Board of Education received a reading of a draft policy to govern generative artificial intelligence use by students and staff. The policy was developed by an AI policy committee that met four times this year and consulted Kansas Association of School Boards recommendations and peer districts.

Director of Teaching and Learning Erica Mickelson said the policy includes definitions distinguishing generative AI (for example, ChatGPT and Google Gemini) from other AI, guidance on acceptable uses for staff and students, and a plan for professional development. The policy also recommends that violations for students be handled through existing discipline procedures in the student handbook.

Board members said students already use generative AI and emphasized the need for staff training so teachers can guide proper classroom use and cite AI sources. Trustees also asked staff to ensure that any discipline language in the policy aligns with student handbook provisions; the director agreed to align the policy and handbook language before a later vote.

Mickelson and board members noted the policy will need periodic updates as AI tools evolve and the district plans to offer training at the start of the school year and on an ongoing basis. The item was presented as a reading; the board did not adopt the policy at the June meeting.