Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Virtual School Consolidation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
FCPS plans to fold middle- and elementary-level remote program into Frederick County Virtual School
Summary
Frederick County Public Schools officials told the Curriculum & Instruction Committee on June 11 that the district will consolidate its Remote Virtual Program (RVP) for elementary and middle grades under the Frederick County Virtual School (FCVS) beginning next school year to improve operational efficiency and state reporting.
Get email alerts on the Virtual School Consolidation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Frederick County Public Schools officials told the Curriculum & Instruction Committee on June 11 that the district will consolidate its Remote Virtual Program (RVP) for elementary and middle grades under the Frederick County Virtual School (FCVS) beginning next school year to improve operational efficiency and state reporting.
District leaders said consolidation will allow the RVP to be “formally recognized as part of a school for state reporting purposes” while preserving students’ ability to remain connected to their geo‑identified (home) schools for extracurricular participation. Mr. Watson, an administrator for FCVS, said the consolidated structure will let the district “continue to find operational efficiencies” and expand course offerings, particularly for advanced placement and dual‑enrollment options.
The move follows a presentation on enrollment and instructional models for FCVS and RVP. Watson and Mr. Hoover, RVP administrators, described the full‑time FCVS high school model as combining two weekly synchronous sessions per course with asynchronous work and daily teacher access; the middle‑school RVP was described as a blended model with advisory, PowerBlock tutoring and asynchronous blocks. FCVS supplemental programs continue to serve students who take one or more online courses while remaining enrolled in their home schools. Watson said FCVS has offered online courses since 2012 and estimated that roughly 30% of students at recent graduations took at least one FCVS high‑school course.
During public comment, students and parents described reasons they chose virtual options: safety from bullying, need for a quieter learning environment, medical issues and better academic outcomes. A student who identified as part of the remote virtual program said, “I do not feel safe in school,” and credited the virtual program with improved confidence and academic performance. Parent speakers asked whether the virtual models could continue to provide the structured support used in RVP and how students would transition back to in‑person settings. Ronnie Adema (public commenter) asked why the district removed the RVP high‑school offering referenced in the budget questions and raised concerns about reductions in synchronous instructional minutes in some virtual offerings.
Committee members and staff discussed operational details: students enrolled in FCVS will remain tied to geo‑identified (home) schools for accountability and extracurricular access, while the school coding for reporting will reflect the virtual school. Administrators said the consolidation will likely take the coming school year to fully implement and that separate leadership teams and school improvement plans may remain under the larger FCVS umbrella while the district evaluates efficiencies.
District staff identified expansion priorities tied to the consolidation, including adding AP courses, more elective options (fine arts, business, some social studies offerings) and increased dual‑enrollment pathways. They also said the district will continue onboarding and transition work to prepare middle‑school students for virtual high‑school models and will track climate and participation data for ongoing adjustments.
No formal board action or vote was reported at the June 11 meeting on the consolidation; staff described the plan as an operational decision and implementation timeline that will be worked through administratively and brought back to the committee for updates.
The committee closed the discussion with questions about outreach and awareness; staff described ongoing recruitment efforts (counselor briefings, registration‑night tables, system communications and collaborations with PPW and principals) and said they would continue to examine marketing and parent communications to increase awareness.
Looking ahead, district leaders said they will monitor enrollment, student engagement, course offerings and transition supports, and report progress to the committee during the next school year.

