Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee outlines plaque program, discusses restoring former railroad office
Summary
Members reviewed a plan to mount 12 building plaques and install seven freestanding markers, discussed expanding the program next year if the budget permits, and raised preliminary ideas about restoring a small railroad office building now stored at the lagoon.
Members of the committee opened a discussion about a local plaque project, describing plans to mount 12 smaller plaques on buildings and place seven larger, freestanding plaques on properties around town.
Committee members said several property owners are on board, one owner declined to participate, and some plaques already have been ordered and billed so they cannot be swapped out before installation. Members said they hope to identify additional plaque candidates by the next meeting if the committee’s budget is approved.
The conversation shifted to an historic railroad office building the committee discussed moving back downtown and restoring as a possible museum extension. Committee members described the structure as roughly 10 feet wide by 25–30 feet long, said it was moved into town by the railroad in the 1970s, and reported the city previously bought it for a dollar and relocated it twice — once to the plaza and later to a site referred to in the meeting as the lagoon off Den Road.
Members described the restoration idea as preliminary. They discussed the possibility of creating a separate foundation to raise funds for restoration so work would not rely on the city budget. No formal motion or budget action was taken; members only discussed options and next steps.
Several members urged caution about downtown siting and noted challenges in identifying an available location. One member suggested the city’s commuter lot as a potential placement but said any move or reuse would require further review and approvals.
The committee also reviewed two pages of research candidates for next year’s plaques — a mix of houses, churches and businesses — and acknowledged that some entries remain under research and are not finalized. Members asked staff to continue research and return with prioritized candidates and cost implications at a future meeting.
No formal votes or binding directions to staff were recorded on the plaque program or the building restoration; the discussion was exploratory and contingent on future budget approval and further research.
