Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Triton committee opens formal review of cell‑phone rules after mixed views from members
Summary
Committee members debated a possible bell‑to‑bell cell‑phone ban and agreed to a formal process next year involving school councils, students and parents. Some members urged a stricter ban citing classroom distraction, while others argued phones are educational tools and said enforcement and equity concerns must be addressed.
The Triton Regional School Committee on June 11 discussed whether to tighten restrictions on student cell‑phone use in classrooms, but members stopped short of adopting new rules and directed the administration to pursue a formal review process with school councils, students and families next year.
Committee member Paul (requesting oversight through school councils and student groups) argued for removing phones from classrooms, citing research and examples from nearby districts and saying a bell‑to‑bell policy would reduce distraction and improve learning. He proposed a process like Ipswich or Newburyport had used: staff and unions first review, then administration and the committee consider a policy change.
Other committee members and the superintendent pushed back on an outright ban. They urged that teachers be given tools to manage devices and that phones can also be instructional tools. Examples raised in the discussion included using phones for quick formative checks (audience‑response tools such as Kahoot), video and audio production, and sensor‑based activities in science classes. Students and staff also raised safety and communication concerns: committee members noted that after‑school cancellations, last‑minute dismissal changes and extracurricular logistics are reasons many families provide phones to children.
Principal Patrick and other administrators told the committee that elementary and middle schools already require phones to be secured (in backpacks or lockers) and that at the high school phones are supposed to be put away during class and used during passing periods and lunch. The principal said the high‑school council and student council have discussed the issue and that administration plans to run a community engagement process next year—parent forums, student forums and staff conversations—before any formal policy change is proposed.
Student representative Owen Silver told the committee he supported keeping small‑class AP offerings and cautioning against using enrollment data as a blunt instrument to eliminate valuable classes; his remarks came in the broader conversation about programming, not as a direct statement about phones.
No vote was taken on a cell‑phone ban. The committee agreed to work with the high‑school council and student groups next year and asked staff to return with a recommended process and timeline for community engagement and any proposed policy language.
What’s next: Administration will convene school council, student council and parent engagement sessions in the 2025‑26 school year and will report back to the school committee with recommended next steps and any proposed policy language.
