Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Economic Development Grant Twggm topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Concord holds public hearing on proposed 3-year, 85% tax-base grant for TWG GM engine project

3780470 · June 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City of Concord officials on Monday held a public hearing on a proposed three-year, 85% tax-base economic development grant for TWG GM Performance Power Units LLC to support a manufacturing and research project in Concord.

City of Concord officials on Monday held a public hearing on a proposed three-year, 85% tax-base economic development grant for TWG GM Performance Power Units LLC to support a manufacturing and research project in Concord.

Sam, a Cabarrus Economic Development Corporation representative, told the council the company plans operations at two Concord sites — 7455 Valor Place NW on the Hendrick Campus and 4540 Fortune Avenue NW in International Business Park — to design and test engines intended to meet Formula 1 standards. Sam said the project would involve new manufacturing, research-and-development and information-technology equipment and the hiring of highly skilled employees.

The project’s projected real and personal property investment was presented as approximately $155,000,000. Sam said the company expects to create between about 300 and 350 new full-time jobs with average wages above the county average. Staff estimated the three-year grant would total roughly $1,000,153 and projected net revenue to the city during the grant term would be over $238,000. Sam said initial operations are anticipated to occur at an existing General Motors facility in Concord to accelerate the project timeline.

The presentation was delivered as a public hearing item; no motion, vote or final approval of the grant was recorded in the meeting transcript. Council members present were offered an opportunity to ask questions; no substantive questions or votes appear in the record.

If the council later approves the grant, the agreement would combine two earlier approvals from February into a single grant and revise ownership information, according to staff. Sam stated that combining approvals does not change the previously approved total investment or terms.

City staff did not present a timeline for final council action during the hearing. The item will return to the council for consideration in a subsequent meeting where a motion and vote would be recorded.