Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council refers Superior Water, Light and Power rate complaint to finance committee, seeks PSC briefing
Summary
After residents raised concerns about a proposed rate increase from Superior Water, Light and Power Company, the Superior City Council voted to refer a citizen letter and the company’s proposed increase to the city finance committee and requested a Public Service Commission representative be invited to explain the state process.
The Superior City Council voted to refer a citizen correspondence about a proposed rate increase by Superior Water, Light and Power Company to the city finance committee and asked staff to invite a representative from the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin to explain the state process.
Councilor Olson had pressed for clarity after the council received a citizen letter outlining concerns about utility rates. Olson asked “where do we go with something like this?” and whether the city has input on private utility rate-setting. A staff speaker explained that the matter is handled by the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin and that the commission approves rate requests by reviewing utility expenditures and requested returns. Several councilors said they were concerned about rising bills and urged residents to attend PSC hearings. Councilor McKenzie moved to refer item 6.4 to the finance committee; the motion was seconded by Councilor Bender and passed.
Why it matters: the council said it has limited authority over privately owned utilities and sought an informational briefing so citizens and council members can better understand the state process. Speakers recommended coordinating attendance at PSC public hearings and exploring the PSC’s procedures through the finance committee.
Discussion points included the limited municipal authority over private utilities, the role of the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin in approving rates, and whether collective attendance at PSC hearings might influence outcomes. Council members noted the burden of higher rates on residents and suggested the finance director invite a PSC representative to a committee meeting. The formal action taken was referral of the correspondence and related materials to the finance committee for follow-up; no changes to rates were made by the council at the meeting.
Next steps: the finance committee is to consider the referral and may schedule a PSC briefing for the finance director and committee members to explain the state regulatory process.
