Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Processes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State timeline change for plan reviews will force earlier completeness checks, Suffolk staff says
Summary
Planning staff told council House Bill 26 60 shortens local review timelines for subdivision plats and site plans, pushing Suffolk to require more complete first submissions; staff will present a UDO amendment to align city practice with the state code.
City planning staff warned Suffolk City Council on June 4 that a recent state code change referred to in the meeting as House Bill 26 60 shortens the statutory timeframes for local plan reviews and will require the city to change its intake and completeness procedures.
Kevin Wine, the director of planning and community development, said the change reduces some first-review windows from 60 days to 40 days and shortens allowable resubmittal review periods — ultimately requiring a third resubmittal review to be completed in 14 days under the new schedule. “This bill specifically shrinks, the time line that the city has, which is previously 60 days to 40 days on that first review,” Wine said during his presentation.
Why it matters: Under Suffolk’s current practice many applicants submit plans at 50–70% engineering completion and then iterate with city reviewers. The shortened statutory review schedule will require staff to deem applications complete before the statutory clock starts and to identify deficiencies earlier in the process.
What staff will change
• Remove a UDO table column that redundantly listed internal review timeframes and instead reference state code timeframes directly; staff said a text amendment to the Unified Development Ordinance will be presented at a future meeting.
• Tighten intake procedures so that first submissions include the documents necessary to trigger the state review clock and avoid repeated new issues appearing on later resubmittals.
• Coordinate across reviewing departments — planning, public works (stormwater), traffic engineering, fire, and public utilities — to set clear completeness criteria for applicants.
Wine told council the new deadlines make the city’s initial “deem complete” decision more consequential: if applicants repeatedly fail to resolve outstanding comments by the statutory deadlines, staff may have to disapprove the plan and require a new submittal rather than allow open-ended iterations.
Status and next steps
Staff said they will bring a UDO text amendment to eliminate the redundant review-time table and to align the city’s rules with the state code. The change is planned for presentation to the planning commission and council later in June. No formal council action occurred on June 4.
