Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Developer Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council asks staff for analysis after developers request $10M+ in infrastructure support for multiple housing projects
Summary
Developers seeking help covering pioneer infrastructure and oversizing costs told Ames City Council that city participation is needed to advance several housing projects; staff estimated all requests together could exceed $10 million and asked council for direction.
A group of developers and city staff presented the Ames City Council on Tuesday with a preliminary list of infrastructure asks tied to several proposed housing projects on the city’s growth fringe. The combined requests included oversizing of water and sewer mains, public road work, right‑of‑way acquisition and other developer‑requested costs that staff estimated could total about $10 million if the city granted every ask.
City planning staff told council they compiled requests from multiple projects — including Greenbrier (in annexation), Auburn Trail, Hayden’s Preserve and others — and emphasized the estimates were developer‑supplied and not yet verified by city engineers. The projects collectively represent more than 1,400 potential housing units under different land‑use scenarios, staff said.
Developers and representatives told council the requested contributions were intended either to eliminate an upfront financing gap that would prevent a project from proceeding or to make infill/edge development financially feasible under current market conditions. Developers asked staff to consider flexibility in oversizing policies, potential city contributions to pioneer infrastructure and to weigh options such as tax increment financing versus city tax abatement programs.
Council members did not take action but asked staff to return with prioritized recommendations, per‑project cost/benefit analysis, budget options and comparisons with peer cities. Several council members asked staff to produce metrics — for example, city dollars per unit created and whether city contributions produce demonstrable affordability or other agreed public benefits — and to propose clear eligibility criteria for any incentive program.
Developers said some requests were blocking project starts, while staff cautioned that approving the entire package would be an unprecedented budgetary commitment. Council instructed staff to engage public works, finance and legal to analyze timing, phasing and funding options and to return with a recommended framework rather than project‑by‑project ad hoc approvals.
