Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
USD 501 board adopts stricter cell‑phone policy for students, gives principals discretion on enforcement
Summary
The Topeka USD 501 Board of Education on June 5 approved updated Board Policy 2945 restricting personal electronic devices bell‑to‑bell at secondary schools, adding progressive discipline steps and exceptions for medical needs and field trips; the board asked staff to monitor implementation and return with feedback.
Get email alerts on the Student Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Education of Unified School District 501 (Topeka Public Schools) approved an update to Board Policy 2945 on June 5 to limit student use of personal electronic communication devices during the school day and to set a progressive discipline structure for violations.
Policy committee presenter Miss Whiteman introduced the proposal and described the primary changes: a broader definition of “personal electronic communication device” to explicitly include smartphones, smartwatches and tablets; separate rules for elementary, middle and high schools; and a four‑step progressive discipline sequence ranging from teacher warnings to parent meetings and loss of privileges. "The committee felt, like all discipline, it's progressive," Whiteman said during the presentation.
The board's update requires middle‑school students (grades 6–8) to power devices off from the first bell to the last and to store them in a locker or classroom storage area. High‑school students must keep devices powered off and out of sight from bell to bell unless a building principal grants an exception for a supervised lunch period. Elementary rules remain largely as under current district practice. The policy retains explicit exceptions for documented medical needs and gives building principals latitude to allow device use on some field trips where practical concerns apply.
Miss Bulley moved the final motion to approve the policy with a narrowly worded amendment adding "bathrooms and locker rooms" to the section addressing prohibited uses; the board adopted that amendment and then approved the policy. Dr. Anderson said the district will include guidance on the new rules in principal training this summer and asked that building and student advisory groups review early implementation: "I will put this on the agenda" of the principal‑superintendent advisory and the student superintendent advisory, he said, so the board can review any issues after initial rollout.
Board members and administrators emphasized that the policy is intended to reduce classroom distractions while keeping students in school rather than relying on suspensions. During discussion members said the policy language leaves room for principals to require students who repeatedly violate the rule to surrender phones at arrival and retrieve them at dismissal for a defined period instead of immediately imposing an out‑of‑school suspension.
The adopted policy also: restates that the district assumes no liability for lost personal devices; instructs staff to model device expectations during instructional time; and maintains that transportation staff and building principals may limit devices on buses if they become a safety or operational issue.
The board agreed to collect implementation feedback and return the policy for review if problems arise. Miss Foley asked that the district monitor incidents during passing periods and vulnerable student populations; Whiteman and Dr. Anderson said enforcement guidance and reporting options will be part of the administrative rollout.
Votes at the meeting were recorded by voice; the motion to adopt the updated policy carried with all votes in, and a board member requested the language change about bathrooms and locker rooms during the motion.
The board meeting packet lists the change as updates to Board Policy 2945 (cell phones/personal electronic devices).

